Search for: "Reed v. Mai" Results 701 - 720 of 2,094
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, takes a look at the SEC’s track record in this area and calls for the agency to reinforce its efforts to police outsider trading. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
 This facet itself of the Constitution forces us to realize that “fixity” may be a sometime thing, though, tellingly, the defense of Article VII must take the form either of an Ackermanian justified illegality or, as argued instead by his colleague Akhil Reed Amar, an assertion that the “confederation” announced in the Articles, including the strictures of Article XIII, had in effect been dissolved by the utter failure, for example, to elicit sufficient… [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
” Importantly, it seems quite plausible that Chief Justice Earl Warren, had he not felt compelled to placate Justice Stanley Reed — the last holdout for Jim Crow — could have written a more muscular opinion in Brown. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:05 am by Larry Tolchinsky
Love, 382 So.2d 647, 648 (Fla.1979);  Reed v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, takes a look at what he regards as a likely SEC investigation and the questions that the SEC likely will be asking. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]