Search for: "Refuse Materials, Inc." Results 701 - 720 of 3,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2019, 10:06 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Although she refused Petitioner’s request about ten times, she eventually relented because she felt that she had nowhere else to go that night. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Not only do CJEU cases take an expansive approach to the issue of non-material damage in particular, they also take a simi [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:18 am by Ben
 The Kluwer Copyright Blog has more on the decision by Mr Justice Birss in Warner Music & another v TuneIn Inc [2019] EWHC 2923 (ch). [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 2:40 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
After the administrative law judge refused to approve the proposed settlement agreements despite the recommendation from the NLRB General Counsel , the NLRB reviewed the administrative law judge’s decision on special appeal. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:59 am by John Jascob
By Brad Rosen, J.D.In a recent filing, defendants Jitesh Thakkar and his firm, Edge Financial Technologies, Inc., renewed their motion for summary judgment which was initially filed in September 2019. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Jed Rubenfeld
” Section 230 was prompted by Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:45 am by Steve Baird®
The post Put a Sock in Informational Refusals? [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:54 am
 In re Thomas, 79 U.S.P.Q.2d 1021, 1024 (TTAB 2006) (citing Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:30 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
Section 230 was enacted as a response to Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:21 am
It is not enough that the proposed mark merely appear on educational or informational materials. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 8:02 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Value Village Stores Inc. 2016 HRTO 1229 (CanLII), [2016] O.H.R.T.D. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 2:39 pm by Patricia Salkin
Since County officials expressed their intent to stop the project shortly following receipt of this letter, and because the County ultimately did refuse to issue certain permits, the court found there were genuine questions of material fact with regard to the alleged conspiracy between the Delegates and the County. [read post]