Search for: "Register Publishing Company v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2024, 9:18 am
United StatesLindell v Mail Media Inc.Decision Date: December 10, 2021 The US District Court in Southern New York dismissed Michael Lindell’s defamation complaint against Mail Media Inc. and Laura Collins and granted the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss since Lindell failed to state a viable claim. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
Established in 1931, SGA has for 90 years successfully operated with a two-word mission statement: “Protect Songwriters,” and continues to do so throughout the United States and the world. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am
But it was not a claim filed by Oppenheimer, but a claim referred to the CCB from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
Vergeer en Zonen before District Court of The Hague (Class 46) Poland Polish Patent Office partially invalidates VOGUE registration for Advance Magazine Publishers (Class 46) Poland, brands and billboards (Class 46) South America South American cooperation plan in IP rights (IP tango) Spain Spanish Ministry of Employment auctioning brand ‘Galerías Preciados’ (Class 46) Russia Interbrand’s ranking of Russia’s most valuable brands (IP… [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
A version of this article previously was published on Securities Docket. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
The court granted the SEC’s summary judgment motion in part, holding that the defendants had offered and sold unregistered securities since it found that TerraUSD, LUNA and MIR tokens were investment contracts under United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm
According to the SEC’s investigation, the investment adviser advised its clients to invest into films produced by a specific production company without disclosing that the production company paid the founder approximately $530,000 in exchange for investments by its clients. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IPBiz),Eco-patent commons meets open innovation: (Securing Innovation),Settle the patent infringement case by selling your company? [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
Once the proposed rule is published in the Federal Register the public and entities including industry organizations, individual producers and consumer groups will have 60 days to comment. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:53 pm
The amendment overrules the holding in Rope v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
: Omnicare, Inc v OHIM, Astellas Pharma GmbH (Class 46) CFI delivers judgment in case concerning ability of designer who assigns business and related IP to another company, to object when the company tries to register his name as a CTM: Elio Fiorucci v OHIM (IPKat) CFI: Good faith irrelevant when selling non-misleading sausages: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
Maybe You Can Take it With You: Post-mortem Publicity Rights in the United States/Marilyn Monroe World Trademark Review (pdf): http://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/issues/article.ashx? [read post]
18 Sep 2006, 8:40 am
***Viral V. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
The Final RegulationsThis past Tuesday the government published in the Federal Register a series of final rules issued a few days earlier by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:55 am
BitMEX has stated that a hardware issue caused the outage. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
See also United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2025, 9:01 pm
” The FTC alleged the companies compete in three relevant product markets where they are alleged to be each other’s only or closest competitor: (1) optical software tools; (2) photonic software tools for designing and simulating photonic devices; and (3) Register Transfer Level (“RTL”) power consumption analysis tools. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:57 am
These arguments often spoke in the register of the affirmative constitutional duty of legislators to act, rather than the register more familiar today, of constitutional constraints on what the state can do. [read post]
