Search for: "Robert S. Russell" Results 701 - 720 of 1,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2016, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on amicus briefs filed in support of the respondents in Friedrichs and Zubik. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am by Lisa McElroy
  Does it mean that Chief Justice Roberts, who authored the opinion, thinks it’s OK to hurt little animals? [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
  [Disclosure:  Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represented the petitioners in Freeman, but the author of this post was not involved in the case.] [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:51 am by Ted Allen
In addition, two directors--Carlos Cardoso, a compensation committee member, and Robert Coutts, chair of the nominating committee--had 49 percent opposition. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am by Conor McEvily
(Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as co-counsel to Florence.) [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:55 pm by Anna Christensen
  In this, Lewis at least suggests that the Roberts Court is serious about reading Congress’s intent neutrally. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:53 am by Amanda Rice
 [Disclosure:  Goldstein, Howe & Russell filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in al-Kidd.] [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:00 pm
Robert Barnes has this article on the two cases for the Washington Post. [read post]
Read the entirety of Andy's report here.Along with me and Professor Alterman, the panel included Professor Russell Brown (University of Alberta) and Professor Bryan Schwartz (University of Manitoba) who gave details and criticisms of Canada's approach, Professor David Callies (University of Hawaii) discussing the Asia and Pacific approaches, and Professor Tom Roberts (Wake Forest University) comparing our homegrown system. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
”  Finally, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post notes “unmistakable comparisons to the court’s action on the Social Security Act of 1935” (which the Court upheld in a pair of cases in 1937). [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am by Amy Howe
” At the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Peter Smith and Robert Tuttle analyze last week’s decision in Walker v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:23 am by Diane Marie Amann
” Chaired by Philippa Webb, King’s College London, and featuring presentations by Lanah Kammourieh, Université de Paris II (Panthéon-Assas); Russell Buchan, University of Sheffield; Sejal Parmar, Central European University; and Jemima Stratford, Brick Court Chambers. ► “Jurisdictional Challenges and Accountability in a Transnational Context. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm by Ruthann Robson
  As Chief Justice Roberts phrased it to Singh, Lane’s argument would essentially require Franks, the president of the college who terminated Lane, to “be a better analyzer of Supreme Court precedent than the three Eleventh Circuit judges. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
” In The New York Law Journal (subscription required), Robert Schonfeld looks at the effects that the Court’s decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 8:46 am by Lyle Denniston
Chief Justice Roberts announces the Court’s per curiam decision in Zubik v. [read post]