Search for: "Running v. Miller" Results 701 - 720 of 971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
In Huras v Primerica Financial Services Limited[13]an agreement on settlement was reached which provided small compensation to each member of the large group of class members.[14]  The settlement provided for additional compensation to be paid to the Ontario and British Columbia RPs – $3000 and $2000 respectively.[15]  By way of contract, in Sutherland, Justice Winkler disallowed a claim where the RP sought compensation for work related to the administration of the… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm by Ron Coleman
Here’s a very good article by Arnold & Porter’s Randy Miller, strictly for trademark lawyers and those who encamp around them, on the Advertising Compliance website run by my old friend John Lichtenburger about an important development:  The Third Circuit’s decision in Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:08 am by Lawrence Solum
Americans love a “rags to riches” story and have long believed that hard work and determination will pay off in the long run. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
rdftaxpro: KPE – Here is what I hope happens in 2012 – Every single current member of Congress who runs for re-election in 2012 is voted out of office! [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:27 am by Jon Hyman
Here’s the rest of what I read this week: Discrimination EEOC sues construction company for not hiring applicant with epilepsy to run heavy equipment – from Walter Olson’s Overlawyered Obama EEOC Wipes Out Jobs By Making Hiring More Difficult – from Washington DC Examiner 10 reasons for employers to be jolly about the ADA (says the EEOC) – from Robin Shea’s Employment and Labor Insider The ADA May Invalidate a High School Diploma… [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The same judge made the judgment in Miller v Associated Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 2677 (QB)) available last week. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Paul Staines, who runs the blog, will now be required to appear before the Inquiry. [read post]