Search for: "S. H. V. United States" Results 701 - 720 of 5,163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States 21-816Issues: (1) Whether — given that the Supreme Court held in Rehaif v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Steve Lubet
Israel’s higher education institutions are leaders in uniting diverse populations. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
There are no mandatory data retention laws in the United States of America. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:16 am by Michael Lowe
  This is true even if the states investigation confirms that these past incidents happened in a different county from the county where the current charges are filed. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff alleges that on August 2, 2013, Defendant again became intoxicated, physically forced Plaintiff to leave their joint hotel room and stated that he wanted "20 men to rape" her. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:57 pm by Karen Gullo
ETWHERE: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit livestream:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC78NfBf28AQe3x7-SbbMC2AFor more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/uniloc-v-apple Contact:  AaronMackeySenior Staff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:51 am by Sean G. Hanagan
While this case may come too late for some who have had to seek other work or leave the United States, other petitioners and beneficiaries whose cases were denied may find this useful. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:30 pm
  62 million children have been aborted in the United States since Roe was decided. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 1:24 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:57 am by DONALD SCARINCI
And Section 1806(f) establishes special in camera and ex parte procedures to determine the admissibility of such evidence, if the Attorney General attests that a typical adversarial hearing would harm the national security of the United States. [read post]