Search for: "S. P.C. N."
Results 701 - 720
of 844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
The opinion then goes on to explain that [n]othing in the record shows that appellant researched whether his activities constituted the unauthorized practice of law under the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:52 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents the petitioners in the case. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Glenn Lammi argues that, in the words of the WLF’s amicus brief, “[a]n expansion of Sherman Act standing to indirect purchasers would …’deter aggressive competition of the very sort that the antitrust laws are intended to encourage. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:55 am
Stolper alleges that “[i]n the course of their employment as Ms. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:53 am
YC MD, P.C. v Shusterman (___ AD3d ___, 2024 NY Slip Op 03893 [2d Dept July 24, 2024]), is a warning to petitioners / plaintiffs to critically and objectively assess the strength of their claims before embarking upon a legal proceeding under a contract with a prevailing party provision. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 6:40 am
Research your state's statute of limitation for asbestos cases. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:03 pm
In the terms of Section 102 of the Copyright Act, copyright protection “[i]n no case … extend[s] … to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Over on the civil front, American Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:55 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:45 am
The order noted that “[i]n the event that the plaintiff fails to comply with the directives of this [o]rder, plaintiff’s complaint shall be dismissed upon the Movant’s submission of an Affirmation of Non-Compliance. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
Sellers, the “court ruled 6-3 that convicted murderer Keith Tharpe deserved another chance in federal court to prove that his death sentence was tainted by the white juror’s reference to Tharpe as a ‘n—–‘ and other racist remarks. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 10:25 am
and attorneys with the Michigan law firm, Barron, Rosenberg, Mayoras & Mayoras, P.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:27 am
In Monday's second argument, United Haulers Ass'n v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case.] [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:49 am
What’s that got to do with speech? [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:07 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
Murphy, 458 S.W.3d 912, 915 n.1 (Tex. 2015), reh'g denied (June 5, 2015) (citing Tex. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
(MCM) to collect it on Midland's behalf. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
(MCM) to collect it on Midland's behalf. [read post]
