Search for: "SERVICE REPRODUCTION COMPANY"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,096
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2014, 9:30 am
On the sound recording side of the music world, the rights are usually licensed by the record company except for the public performance royalties paid by non-interactive music services, which are collected in the United States by SoundExchange. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:54 am
The Copyright Act makes it an offence to manufacture "any device or means specifically designed or adopted to circumvent any device or means intended to prevent or restrict reproduction of work, a phonogram or a broadcaster to impair the quality of copies made. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 3:18 pm
Every service under the compulsory license except for 3 companies pays willing buyer/willing seller. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
Is there any point in looking at major film companies, etc. for something like that? [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:01 am
Are reproduction for private use [within the meaning of Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29] and transient and incidental reproduction [within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29] permissible only if the original of the reproduction was lawfully reproduced, distributed or made available to the public? [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
Sebelius, over the very constitutionality of the federal health care reform law’s individual mandate, the only issue before the Justices today was the “contraceptive mandate,” which requires some organizations offering health insurance to their employees to cover specified reproductive services. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:35 am
Tuesday, March 25th Reproductive Rights The U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:30 pm
Female workers of the two companies involved and those of other religiously oriented companies would have to cover personally the cost of at least some of the birth-control services — unless the government were to set up a new program on its own to do so, which is a very unlikely prospect. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
Dear Rich: I am starting an online company to provide a service/outlet for people in their communities to sell or give away their unused household items. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:51 pm
Such licenses are available to terrestrial broadcasters, satellite and Internet radio services, on-demand services, music streaming services, bars, restaurants, other commercial establishments – even companies who want to provide “music-on-hold” on their phone systems. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:02 am
Last week the Supreme Court received the first round of amicus briefs in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 3:01 pm
Lester never responded, but sued the company. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Hobby Lobby is one of those company names that makes you think it is a cute, small, family-owned enterprise. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
In my last post about Aereo, I unconcernedly claimed: “This case isn’t about the future of cloud computing companies—those services are protected by the DMCA. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Leia Picard, an Ontario surrogacy consultant, and her company, were charged with 27 offences under both the Assisted Human Reproduction Act and the Criminal Code. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm
Location services and payment services are equally central to infringement; the majority’s contrary assertion is supported largely by disparaging use of “merely,” “simply” and “only. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:21 am
For an on-demand stream, the rate is about 10% of revenue to be shared by the publishing company and the performing rights organization (ASCAP, BMI or SESAC). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 3:57 am
Previously, I began looking at the legal questions involved in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:16 am
In 2007, Verizon Wireless blocked text messages from the reproductive rights group NARAL. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 3:31 am
The judge agreed with the claimant's (Capitol Records) claims that the service was guilty of direct, contributory, and vicarious infringement of Capitol’s reproduction rights, and said ReDigi had no fair-use defence to the infringement as the service was not "capable of substantial non-infringing use"s." [read post]
