Search for: "SHARP v. UNITED STATES"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
For example, In United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 12:53 pm
The fractured decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:10 am
” Trial Judge’s Ex Parte Communication with Jurors Causes Conviction Reversal The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:50 am
If “cosmic constitutional theory” is defined as a theory of interpretation of a (constitutional) legal text, all judges worthy of the name (and, as Graber appropriately points out, lots of non-judges) engage in it, in the United States, and everywhere. [read post]
30 May 2008, 7:25 am
Many conservatives believe the Rehnquist Court correctly interpreted the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
United States, 18-1276, and Ziglar v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am
” If a majority of the Justices choose to side with the State of California and open the floodgates to a new era of speech regulation, I very much looking forward to seeing how they reconcile that with their decision last term in the controversial case of United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
The PEW Research Group’s surveys of public opinion in the United States document the fundamental regime change that has taken place over the last half century. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 10:58 am
" This investigation is governed by regulations promulgated by the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:30 pm
Miles was decided, the Court held in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
“Discovery,” as it is known in the United States, does not exist in Europe. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am
United States Alex Jones has been found guilty by default in all four defamation cases brought by the families of victims of the Sandy Hook school shooting tragedy. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
, Tablet, Feb. 9, 2021, https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/douglass-mackey-ricky-vaughn-memes-first-amendment; Complaint, United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:35 am
In Chapman v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:47 pm
That vessel permits a broad scope of discretionary decisions whether or not in conformity to expectations that is protected by international law, or, more specifically, by the structural nature of the state system with its ideology that states can do no wrong unless they are (eventually--and rarely) brought to account by other states. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
On 30 October 2014, the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) handed down judgment in Reed Elsevier v Bewry. [read post]
