Search for: "SHORT v. USA" Results 701 - 720 of 1,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2012, 9:50 am by Howard Knopf
LSUC in order to extract tens of millions a year from businesses, researchers, taxpayers, educators and students for non-existent rights to non-existent repertoirejust say no to attempts to circumscribe fair dealing that would put Canada at a huge competitive disadvantage to the USA in terms of education, research and innovationjust say no to the injection of the treaty based "three-step test" intended to accomplish the foregoing and undo CCH v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
It was followed in short order by All Saints parish, Long Beach, and St. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am by Ben
 Those Turtles and the issue of pre-1972 copyrights in sound recordings in the USA keep going on and on - with the Ninth Circuit appeals court now asking the lower court in California to consider what the Music Modernization Act (MMA) means for any ongoing disputes involving unpaid digital royalties on pre-1972 recordings. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  He reserved judgment for a short period, handing it down on Wednesday 21 January 2015 ([2015] EWHC 77 (QB)) On 21 January 2015, the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Murray v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:23 am
Allergan USA, Inc., 2009 WL 3294873 (D. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:22 am by Howard Knopf
That said, even excellent tweets such as these are nowhere close to a transcript – for which we await in the hopefully reasonably short fullness of time, if a transcript was taken. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:20 am by Cameron Kerry
In short, there was no business need for the location (this posits that collecting data purely for the sake of exploiting it unilaterally is not a reasonable business purpose). [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 1:31 am by Chloe Pettiti
  Earlier this year the English High Court Relief was granted by the High Court (Akhmedova v Akhmedov and others [2021] EWHC 545 (Fam)). [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It is in reality no different from forcing her to read Bible excerpts.The short answer at the moment is that the District Court recently confused this case with an abortion rights case. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:01 am
The Justice Department is not challenging the underlying merger, which the companies closed in May 2007.Further details regarding U.S. v. [read post]