Search for: "SMITH v. STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 10,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Decided on June 30, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 329 CA 22-00889 IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, AND and CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ONONDAGA COUNTY LOCAL 834, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Decided on June 30, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 329 CA 22-00889 IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, AND and CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ONONDAGA COUNTY LOCAL 834, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:30 am
In the case of Hinerman v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:24 am
The Colorado business owner in 303 Creative v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:35 am
There is much to unpack in the Supreme Court’s decision in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:27 am
Making race-based jury selection decisions in violation of Batson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:14 pm
Smith stated she was happy to work with gays. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
Similarly, while the narrow holding was that the law at issue was unconstitutional because it allowed some nonconsensual recordings -- particularly, body-worn cameras by police officers -- but not others, most state laws contain the same exceptions.So for states -- including California -- with two-party consent statutes, if the opinion stands, I doubt that most of them would survive. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
Such a claim would trivialize free speech protection in the way that the Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Ben Roberts-Smith will pay defendants’ legal costs in his failed defamation case, ABC reports. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Smith, Constitutional Interpretation and Zombie Provisions, (Georgia State University Law Review, Vol. 40, (Forthcoming)).Paul-Olivier Klein & Shee-Yee Khoo, P(r)aying for Religion? [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:13 pm
Smith and the State stipulated to a number of facts: Ms. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
HRS § 431:10–237 [ (1993)3]; see also Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 1:13 pm
In an attempt to express her religious convictions, Smith planned to publish a message on her website explicitly stating her refusal to create websites for same-sex marriages. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:06 am
The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:53 am
’ ” Loving v. [read post]
