Search for: "STATE OF ILLINOIS v. STATE OF INDIANA"
Results 701 - 720
of 804
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Ghana Victor Tieku to develop new copyright collecting org in Ghana (Afro-IP) India Bombay HC rules on copyright in drawings: Part II: Indiana Gratings v Anand Udyog (Spicy IP) Delay in filing power of attorney: Does it prejudice a patent application? [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
The other shareholder was an Illinois corporation. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:02 am
The next year, Bisla's company was temporarily dissolved by the State of Illinois for nonpayment of a filing fee. [read post]
20 May 2009, 2:08 pm
She was recommended for the bench by late Illinois Senator Paul Simon and received a “well qualified” rating by the ABA Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:24 pm
Adopting the Illinois Supreme Court's reasoning in 2314 Lincoln Park West Condominium Association v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:00 pm
Based in Chicago and near Wheaton, Ill., we handle qui tam claims at the local, state and federal levels in Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin and nationwide. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear an appeal in Jones v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:32 am
In addition to Illinois state law matters, our Midwest real estate trial lawyers represent people in federal court and in state courts in Indiana and Wisconsin. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 6:21 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of the plaintiffs (Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:39 am
But the fun comes with the full title: United States of America, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Ill. 1987).Indiana: Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
’ (Ars Technica) (Excess Copyright) (Techdirt) Report on Digital Music Forum East – ISP liability for copyright infringement (Media Wonk) (Media Wonk) Public Knowledge testifies to Congress on cable and satellite copyright (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D Illinois: Website not sufficient to create personal jurisdiction: Richter v INSTAR Enterprises (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 5:25 pm
With offices in Chicago and its outskirts, near Oak Brook, Wheaton and Naperville, Ill., we represent clients in Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin and throughout the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
Rejecting a substantive due process defense of unreasonableness, the Illinois Supreme Court affirmed a statutory penalty of $100 per day - totaling $1,172,100 - against an employer who failed to forward withheld child support to the state. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
Rivera v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
" Indiana: State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 3:02 am
Keller, The Thomas Jefferson School of Law, San Diego, California, and Annecoos Wiersema, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University, ColumbusExecutive CommitteeAll the officers named above, plus: Cindy Galway Buys, Southern Illinois University School of Law, Carbondale; John P. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
