Search for: "STATE v SHARP"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 8:10 am
DeLisle v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 9:32 am
Regarding liens and subrogation interests, a 1970, Tyler Court of Appeals case styled, State Farm v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Mazda Motor Corporation v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:02 am
Crisp contacted two friends, Kevin Sharp and Harold Sword. [read post]
7 May 2014, 10:14 am
HITZ v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:00 am
–Andrew V. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
Unrelated to this, the Virginia Senate refused to agree to legislation that would allow the hunting of fast-moving, sharp-toothed beasts on Sundays.13. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:30 pm
Gun regulation has become even harder since the Supreme Court decision District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
There, the Supreme Court emphasized that debate on public issues `may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks’ on politicians. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:28 am
E.g., Newton v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:04 pm
McKesson Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:06 am
It also brought into sharp focus that confiscation orders will not always be an effective tool in law enforcement’s fight against financial crime. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
On the same day the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson [2019] EWCA Civ 819. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:37 am
This week’s Sixth Circuit ruling in Tucker v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 11:20 pm
In Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
