Search for: "STATE v. MURRAY" Results 701 - 720 of 1,314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am by INFORRM
United States The defamation trial against HBO over a “hoax” child labour report has begun with a statement by the attorney for Mitre Sports International. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:16 am by INFORRM
 This follows a libel action by Al Murray over claims in Nigel Farage’s book that Mr Murray was breaking election expenditure rules. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
Yes, DOL enforcement must be vigorous, and collaborations with state departments of labor must be robust. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" The July 31,1998 letter further states:" You may within thirty (30) calendar days of the receipt of this denial, appeal to the Assistant Commissioner of HPD — The [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am by Andres
Then follows a detailed run through the case-law supporting the separation, including McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73, Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446, and Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Coulson v Wilby heard 6 March 2015 (Warby J). [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am by WIMS
<> Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
US states are considering tightening regulations. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States A Washington D.C based band is suing YouTube, after the website removed its music video. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
It stated that the Extra Division had only provided a very brief explanation of their apportionment of 70%, and although they right considered that the pursuer did not take reasonable care for her own safety, regard also needed to be had to her circumstances. [read post]