Search for: "STATE v. PHILLIPS" Results 701 - 720 of 2,875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2021, 8:26 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Phillips Seyfarth Synopsis:  Arbitration agreements with class and collective action waivers can help employers limit litigation exposure, especially to wage and hour claims. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint (full text) (memo in support of motion for preliminary injunction) in Phillips v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Peter Phillips, Ancient and Comely Order: The Use and Disuse of Arbitration by New York Quakers, 2016 Journal of Dispute Resolution 81-114.Neil Foster, Freedom of Religion and Balancing Clauses in Discrimination Legislation, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2016).New Book:Leslie C. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 10:41 am by WSLL
AffirmedCase Name: ZYGMUNT JOHN SAMIEC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am by Andrew Crank, Olswang LLP
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing)   Earlier this year, the Supreme Court  heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early 2009. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm by Scott Bomboy
The Colorado state supreme court didn’t accept Phillips’ appeal and his attorneys then petitioned the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
However, the court also stressed that Phillips’ refusal to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins occurred before the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry in United States v. [read post]