Search for: "SU et al v. AT&T, INC. et al" Results 701 - 720 of 772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
HUGH CASSIDY et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants, and Respondents, WILLIAM STRAW, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:17 pm
DeWolff, Boberg & Assoc., Inc., et al. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
The Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 6:06 am by centerforartlaw
He stated that he had a “9.5 out of 10” chance of convincing a jury of their legitimacy, citing a poem discovered in the possession of the fake owner as strong evidence, and ironically stating, “you can’t make up this stuff, you just can’t. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 8:10 am
Connolly, et al., "Operation for Anorexigen-associated Valvular Heart Disease," 122 J. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
The seeds of most of them can also be found in the Supreme Court's crucial holding in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  After filing for incontestability, B&B sued Hargis again in 2006, and the court of appeals found that preclusion from the first trial didn’t apply because of the change in the mark’s circumstances from contestable to incontestable. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
We all tend to take these practices for granted, but you can’t. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:59 pm by Roy Ginsburg
MGA Entertainment, Inc., et al., No. 09-55673 (July 22, 2010), the highly publicized case between two competing doll manufacturers. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]