Search for: "SUPPLEMENT TO OPINION 13" Results 701 - 720 of 986
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2012, 5:55 pm by Paul R. Cressman
The decision was decided narrowly, only 5 to 4, and the Washington Supreme Court has not revisited the issue since it issued this opinion in 2000. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The Court’s February 13, 2012 Rulings In his February 13 opinions, Judge Ellison agreed with the defendants that certain of the New York and Ohio plaintiffs’ allegations were legally insufficient, and that the plaintiffs’ allegations as to certain of the individual defendants were also insufficient. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:20 pm
  Watison brings a half-dozen federal claims, and also around a dozen supplemental state law claims. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Don’t be surprised if the Supreme Court doesn’t grant review:  Kennedy wrote the opinion in Romer, and also the opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
Ct. 1740 (2011), the Second Circuit asked for supplemental briefing on the topic. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
Ct. 1740 (2011), the Second Circuit asked for supplemental briefing on the topic. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
  Certiorari stage documents Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Petitioner’s supplemental brief #1 Petitioner’s supplemental brief #2 Fisher v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  This re-starts the Court's 90-day period to hand down its opinion. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am by Richard Renner
  The decision is particularly disappointing after the ARB had called for supplemental briefing. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In 1993, Hauf contacted the Foundation to buy shark cartilage supplements. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:56 pm
So, they are going to delay the opinion past the normal 90 days from argument. [read post]