Search for: "Schmidt v. Schmidt" Results 701 - 720 of 868
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of  Madden v Midland, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am by Giles Peaker
The facts of Peter Schmidt, about a winding up petition, and JK v MK, about a consensual divorce, were very different from those in the present case. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
16th-century painting of a civil law notary, by Flemish painter Quentin MassysGlobal consensus appears to be moving steadily toward the embrace of a principle touching on  "the ethical considerations which a lawyer should take into account in the field of business and human rights when advising clients. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
   Table of Contents and Excerpt from Rzeslawski's article on the implications of Madden v Midland for post-crash consumer remedies against predatory lending that occurred years earlier  Madden v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:06 am
Gerhard Schmidt, Munich Re, Germany, presented "Insuring nano-Perspective of Munich Re. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:00 am by Jan von Hein
Schmidt*  ZVglRWiss 117 (2018) 429-439 [Development and Diversity in Banking and the Financial Systems] In its first part, the paper discusses the development of the banking systems and, more comprehensively, of the entire financial systems of Germany, Western Europe and other parts of the world under the aspect of diversity. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
  If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees,  you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 10:29 am
Schmidt issued his decision Dec. 23, 2005. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:18 pm
 The Superior Court, in Boyle, addresses this issue citing a Minnesota decision, Schmidt v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Peter J. Sluka
Rosiny v Schmidt, where the First Department reversed the trial court’s finding that a mandatory book value buyout provision was unconscionable (185 AD2d 727 [1st Dept 1992]). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 4:44 am by Florian Mueller
A renegotiated license agreement is my best guess.Finally, here's the amended complaint: 14-10-03 Amended Microsoft v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 5:01 am by Adira Levine
District Court for the District of Columbia handed down its decision in Electronic Privacy Information Center v. [read post]