Search for: "Sherman v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,052
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2011, 8:32 am
Sherman (9th Cir. 2011) 646 F.3d 1161, the United States Forest Service established management guidelines under the 2004 Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment (“2004 Framework”) that govern 11.5 million acres of federal land in the Sierra Nevada region. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:58 pm
”The September 30 complaint in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:38 pm
In 2008, various entities sued the insured for conspiring to fix prices for cabotage services between the United States and Puerto Rico in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:26 pm
Mylan, Inc., United States District Court, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 10-1077, August 31, 2011. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:39 pm
Conspiracy to Rig Bids, Fix Prices, Allocate MarketsAccording to a two-count criminal information filed on September 15 in the federal district court in Houston, the Japan-based Bridgestone conspired to rig bids, fix prices, and allocate market shares of marine hose in the United States and elsewhere in violation of Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act and, separately, conspired to make corrupt payments to government officials in various Latin American countries to obtain and retain… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:16 pm
This one entertains me becaues it faintly evokes the studio system of the 1930's and the decades of antitrust action by the FTC, with United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:58 pm
However, unmentioned and undiscussed is the line of authority stemming from United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Saudi Arabian Oil Co.Docket: 10-1393Issue(s): (1) Whether the political question doctrine deprives the federal courts of jurisdiction to adjudicate a Sherman Act and Clayton Act damage case against both private and state-owned businesses operating in the United States; and (2) whether the act of state doctrine bars antitrust claims against defendants whose conduct was commercial, and where it came to fruition and had its effect in the United… [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
" In McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
Cooter and Siegel, for example, believe that a Resolution VI-based reading of Article I, Section 8 support revisiting the analysis in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:19 am
Harris v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
Taking the per se position on vertical territorial restraints was United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:02 pm
United States (1969 Trade Cases ¶72,730) and United States v. [read post]
