Search for: "Short v. Davis " Results 701 - 720 of 979
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
(L&RUK Health Warning: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies.) [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Davis Polk & Wardwell, 30 AD3d 171, 172 [1st Dept 2006], affd 8 NY3d 428 [2007]; see also Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 11:51 am by Tessa Shepperson
July In July the decision is published in the OFT v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The two standards involve overlapping factors, but in short raising a colorable claim of immunity (one of the requirements for removal) is a lower threshold than establishing actual immunity, i.e. to have the case dismissed (as discussed further below). [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit held that the safe harbor’s “meaningful cautionary language” requirement is not satisfied when a company’s forward-looking statement is accompanied by a non­-forward-looking statement that the plaintiff alleges is false or misleading, because “it is likely that no cautionary language—short of an outright admission of the false or misleading nature of the non-forward looking statement—would be… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am by Colin Murray
Of course, the criminalisation of homosexuality was discussed in Parliament in the same era and that didn’t stop the UK and Ireland from having to revisit that issue at the behest of Strasbourg decisions in Dudgeon v UK and Norris v Ireland. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm by Giles Peaker
(Finally) AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) This High Court judgment is remarkable in many ways, most of them worrying. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am by Richard Hunt
Davi, LLC, 2:21-CV-00273-MCE-DB, 2022 WL 256867, at *5 (E.D. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
The short “Easter Term” for court sittings ended on 26 May 2017. [read post]