Search for: "Smith v. Manning (two Cases)" Results 701 - 720 of 858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm by Elie Mystal
”A generation later, two new legal theories are available to challenge legacy preferences. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm by Mark Litwak
Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 (1962)).Copyright InfringementFor a plaintiff to prevail in a copyright infringement case, "two elements must be proved: (1) ownership of a valid copyright, and (2) copying of constituent elements of the work that are original. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
  It goes on to point out however, that the PCC’s stance on this issue is not entirely consistent “only a few weeks ago, when two readers complained about the Sun’s use of ‘bender’ to refer to a gay man, the PCC hid behind its ‘third-party’ rule to ignore the complaint. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 12:52 pm by Bruce Korol
The U.S. had lodged two new additional charges of money laundering and fraud as an insurance policy in case Bout got off and now Bout wants those charges to come to court. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:00 am by Kashmir Hill
As noted by How Appealing, a Ninth Circuit panel — consisting of two of the court’s more conservative members, Diarmuid O’Scannlain and Randy Smith, and Judge Charles Wolle (S.D. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am by INFORRM
The Gillettes, Mr Joseph and two others, sued for libel. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:00 am by Michael Scutt
Allow not nature more than nature needs, Man’s life is cheap as beast’s. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Ford, in 1975, Stevens is the fourth-longest-serving Justice in the Court’s history; the record holder is the man Stevens replaced, William O. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
Simple assault is a disorderly persons offense unless committed in a fight or scuffle entered into by mutual consent, in which case it is a petty disorderly persons offense. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:21 am
Discerning readers will however note that this issue also lay at the heart of last week's Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), noted here by the IPKat. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm by law shucks
Finally, there was the Google/YouTube v. [read post]