Search for: "Soling v. New York State" Results 701 - 720 of 3,663
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2021, 8:04 am by John Jascob
Meanwhile, Robinhood was hit with a class action complaint in the Southern District of New York for allegedly using the GameStop trading halt to manipulate the market on behalf of hedge funds (Nelson. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:26 am by John Jascob
Here, the dispute over whether the agreement became binding when signed in New York or when received in Bermuda illustrated "how locating the 'meeting of the minds' can be arranged or confused by the parties or can become enmeshed in state contract law. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
New York, 20-449, and Wolf v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 2:11 am by Peter Mahler
First, reversing in part the lower court’s order, the appellate panel held that under § 1002 (g) of New York’s LLC Law, an appraisal proceeding is the cashed-out, dissenting member’s sole remedy and that, in contradistinction to the analogous statute applicable to dissenting shareholders under the Business Corporation Law (BCL), no exception exists for alleged fraud or illegality in the procurement of the merger. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
This includes courts in California, Delaware, Illinois, New York, and Washington.[26] To determine which category a letter of intent falls under, courts examine the intentions of the parties.[27] In fact, the primary factor of all letter of intent analysis is the intentions of the parties.[28] Intent is the “touchstone” upon which letter of intent litigation hinges.[29] C. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
“These elements must be established by clear and convincing evidence” (Jones v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Paul Stern
Such pleas echo the sentiment of Eric Garner’s family following their $5.9 million settlement with the City of New York, when they stated, “Justice is when somebody is held accountable for what they do. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm by Joy Waltemath
By allowing no inquiry into any conduct preceding the demonstration except to identify “actual participants,” the Board disallowed highly relevant inquiry into identification of those deserving of discipline (Time Warner Cable of New York City LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Another older case found in my year-end roundup.Pilla v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm by Andrew Hamm
New York asks the justices to decide whether a defendant can similarly “open the door” to rebuttal evidence that was previously inadmissible under the Sixth Amendment, which guarantees a criminal defendant’s right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
He subsequently abandoned the defences and the court’s sole task was to determine the quantum of damages. [read post]