Search for: "Spencer v. Spencer" Results 701 - 720 of 1,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2017, 8:28 am by Mandy Perry
 In a recent High Court case (Cox v Spencer [2017] EWHC 2552 (QB)), the employer was granted an order that meant it could image the employee’s computer to see if it contained any of their confidential information. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by WSLL
Spencer, Long, Reimer, Winegar, Beppler, LLP, Park City, Utah.Date of Decision: June 4, 2012Facts: Father and Mother were divorced in Colorado in 2008. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm by Justin Tenuto
” Related articles Privacy Advocates Ask Feds to Stop Facebook Facial Recognition (pcworld.com) Lane et al v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:28 pm by Eric Turkewitz
But don’t take my word for it, as this is what federal judge Frederick Scullin, Jr. said about it in Alexander v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:29 pm by Glenn Reynolds
It’s clearly within Congress’s proper role and — as the Supreme Court held in Quill v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 11:41 am
The commenter implies that structured settlement broker turned lawyer Dick Risk's efforts as co-counsel in the Spencer v Hartford class action was part of the equation. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:52 pm by Steve
Spencer, 2006 WL 2734289, 2 (N.D. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Plant, [1993] 3 SCR 281 at para 45; R v Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 SCR 432 at para 32; R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53, [2012] 3 SCR 34 at paras 39-58; R v Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, [2009] 1 SCR 579 at para 27. 5 Supra note 4 at para 27. 6 2014 SCC 43, [2014] 2 SCR 212 at para 18. 7 Plant, supra note 4 at para 20. 8 Ibid. 9 Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11. 10 2010 SCC 55 at para 38, [2010] 3 SCR 211, per… [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
It may betray personal information long before a Spencer warrant is sought. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen: “Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
* Unauthorized Use of Photograph to Create Fake Dating Profile Not a Violation of Lanham ActMarie-Andrée reports on Yuliana Avalos v. [read post]