Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2016, 7:15 am
The cases came from Minnesota and North Dakota, states where drivers are criminally penalized for refusing to submit to a breath or blood test. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:15 am
The cases came from Minnesota and North Dakota, states where drivers are criminally penalized for refusing to submit to a breath or blood test. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:44 am
Brady’s Blind Spot fleshes out the systems used by prosecutors in Washington, Minnesota, North Carolina and the District. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:24 pm
On May 31, 2016, the Supreme Court decided United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
As plaintiffs argued to the district court, a vehicle that traveled 50 feet in ten seconds would have an average speed of only 3.4 miles per hour. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 7:55 am
Interpreting the Supreme Court of the United States’s ruling in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 6:05 pm
In light of these findings, the court found a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of plaintiffs’ challenge to the DOL rule, noting that the district court in Minnesota, in Labnet, Inc. v DOL, had concluded as much (despite its reluctance to pull the plug pending this eventual determination). [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 11:56 am
The Minnesota District Court dismissed the charges on the basis that warrantless breath testing was not permitted under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 11:56 am
The Minnesota District Court dismissed the charges on the basis that warrantless breath testing was not permitted under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:07 am
In light of these findings, the court found a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of plaintiffs’ challenge to the DOL rule, noting that the district court in Minnesota had concluded as much in Labnet, Inc. v DOL, despite its reluctance to pull the plug pending this eventual determination. [read post]
Minnesota addresses architectural barriers to public places: 2016 amendments to its Human Rights Act
20 Jun 2016, 10:17 am
The amendments do not change the analysis of what is “readily achievable,” which a Minnesota federal district court examined as recently as this February. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:42 am
In that case (Alexander v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
Cope, Archer Advisors LLCCase number: 14-cv-03395 (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota)Case filed: September 8, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 27, 2016 5/31/2016 8/29/2016 2016-66 SEC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 11:34 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 11:34 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 11:18 am
But we conclude the district court abused its discretion when imposing sanctions and vacate the district court’s sanctions order. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:52 am
” Supreme Court Opinion In April of 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed the district court’s judgment, ruling that an approved JD was “final agency action” subject to judicial review. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:38 am
The district court dismissed and/or granted summary judgment on the employee’s claims and he appealed. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am
For example, in Erwin v. [read post]
