Search for: "State v House"
Results 701 - 720
of 28,752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2009, 1:55 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v AF (Appellant) (FC) and another (Appellant) and one other action [2009] UKHL 28 (10 June 2009) Hanoman (FC) (Respondent) v London Borough of Southwark (Appellants) [2009] UKHL 29 (10 June 2009) R v Islam (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) [2009] UKHL 30 [...] [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:03 am
Z T (Kosovo) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2009] UKHL 6 (4 February 2009) Holmes-Moorhouse(FC) (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (Original Appellants and Cross-respondents) [2009] UKHL 7 (4 February 2009) Marks and Spencer plc (Appellants) v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Respondents) [2009] UKHL [...] [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:33 am
This was an important case, building upon some earlier cases, like United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
J and L, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon (2017) EWHC 3411 (Admin) This is a very interesting judicial review, concerning the interrelation of a council’s housing duties under Part 6 and Part 7 Housing Act 1996 and duties to children under s.17 Children Act 1989. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:06 am
The Supreme Court recognized in Arizona v. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 11:30 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:11 am
The competition authorities of individual EU Member States will still apply their national rules on LPP, which may recognize communications with in-house counsel as privileged. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 1:08 pm
Both the house and the senate approved HJ Res 208, and by 1972, 22 states had ratified. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 8:12 am
July 3, 2006)(striking down a non-compete for an in-house attorney and stating that Illinois and other states have done the same). [read post]
Will the Republican Rules Package in the House Make Calling a Constitutional Convention More Likely?
9 Jan 2023, 7:06 am
An ELB reader notes this provision buried in the rules bill, that would potentially revive some old state calls for a constitutional convention: PROVIDING FOR TRANSPARENCY WITH RESPECT TO MEMORIALS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE… Continue reading The post Will the Republican Rules Package in the House Make Calling a Constitutional Convention More Likely? [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 10:19 am
Kay (Fc) V Commissioner of The Police of The Metropolis Appellate Committee Lord Phill [2008] UKHL 69 (26 November 2008) R (On The Application of Jl) V Secretary of State For Justice Appellate Committee Lord [2008] UKHL 68 (26 November 2008) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 9:03 am
In Dr Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am
See, e.g., Pratt v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:23 am
Wilder v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 3:37 am
A case alleging that college athletes are employees entitled to minimum wage and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, Johnson et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:12 am
Washington State Housing Finance Commission: 22-1 6-23-22 Ruling Granting Review.pdfDownload Prior post here. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:02 pm
It is also possible that the Court itself could adopt this remedy in Jarkesy, based on its recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
