Search for: "State v Sullivan" Results 701 - 720 of 2,736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2019, 5:08 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Dallas, 493 U.S. 215, 240 (1990) (reaffirming this principle as to “prior restraint[s] in advance of a final judicial determination on the merits”); State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
., on Friday, April 5, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, California, Diversity, Institutional Investors, Institutional voting, Proxy advisors, SB 826, State law, Surveys Review and Analysis of 2018 U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
The one possible difference between the criminal libel trial and the criminal contempt trial in a catchall injunction case is that a jury must be provided in most criminal cases—including criminal libel cases—if the maximum statutory authorized sentence is over 6 months (or some lower threshold set by state law), but a jury must be provided in criminal contempt cases only if the actual sentence is over 6 months. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
The one possible difference between the criminal libel trial and the criminal contempt trial in a catchall injunction case is that a jury must be provided in most criminal cases—including criminal libel cases—if the maximum statutory authorized sentence is over 6 months (or some lower threshold set by state law), but a jury must be provided in criminal contempt cases only if the actual sentence is over 6 months. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 10:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the abstract: Ten years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its watershed decision in Carcieri v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:33 am by Giles Peaker
They have benefited from, but did not require, the added legal sophistication provided by Mr O’Sullivan’s drafting. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am by SHG
The story is that Associate Justice Harry Blackmun was given authorship of the 7-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Sullivan v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 160 AD3d 1395, the Appellate Division also rejected Petitioner's argument that SDHR was required to hold a hearing on her complaint before it could make a probable cause determination. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Sullivan v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 160 AD3d 1395, the Appellate Division also rejected Petitioner's argument that SDHR was required to hold a hearing on her complaint before it could make a probable cause determination. [read post]