Search for: "State v. Ball" Results 701 - 720 of 2,344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2019, 6:04 am by Betty Lupinacci
Pittsburg[h] Base Ball Club, by New York: Goodwin & Co., c1887, Library of Congress Prints and Photographs DivisionIf you were not aware, the Library of Congress is the place for baseball cards. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
More than a dozen such motions were brought on Monday in Boston’s federal jury trial of United States vs. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 5:30 am by Robert Loeb
In the Guantanamo detainee case Razak Ali v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
As shown by the Lukumi case, decided by a unanimous Court only a few years after Smith, Smith does not have to be a wrecking ball for religious freedom. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:35 pm by Michelle Ball, Attorney for Students
By Michelle Ball, California Education Attorney for Students since 1995Most California public school students must be fully vaccinated to attend public or private classroom-based schools. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Purcell, New York Law School, looks back to Charles Evans Hughes's Supreme Court of the United States for inspiration on how Chief Justices can induce the resignations of Associate Justices  (The Hill).Barbara Lauriat, Texas Tech University School of Law, has published Robinson & Roberts v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
On Mr B's aplication for a stay until determination of his planning appeal, this did not stand a realistic prospect of success Against the argued precedents of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Smith [2006] EWHC 281 QB, South Cambridgeshire DC v Price [2008] EWHC 1234 (Admin) and Brentwood Borough Council v Ball [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB), where injunctions had been refused pending planning appeals, there was the fact that these all concerned injunction… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
On Mr B's aplication for a stay until determination of his planning appeal, this did not stand a realistic prospect of success Against the argued precedents of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Smith [2006] EWHC 281 QB, South Cambridgeshire DC v Price [2008] EWHC 1234 (Admin) and Brentwood Borough Council v Ball [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB), where injunctions had been refused pending planning appeals, there was the fact that these all concerned injunction… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:49 am by John Day
 Defendant hit the ball and let go of the bat at the same time. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:40 am by emagraken
Justice Ball provided the following reasons: [25]         In Hunt v. [read post]