Search for: "State v. Beers" Results 701 - 720 of 1,282
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2013, 6:00 pm by Richard Goldfarb
  He orders a couple of beers and a couple of drinks. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
 The IPKat's resident expert in the affairs of the higher echelons of the British judiciary informs him that litigation in the UK in the honest concurrent use dispute of Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnick v  Anheuser-Busch Inc (noted by the IPKat here) is not going any further. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:42 pm by Madhulika Vishwanathan
 Moving on further, Aparajita highlighted the Bombay High court’s recent decision on Trademark infringement of SABMiller India Ltd. v/s Som. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Ron Coleman
” Costco, you know, is a warehouse where you can buy socks, beer, batteries, garbage bags, deodorant, frozen lasagna, and so very much more, all in bulk, all in one trip. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 8:58 am by Venkat
State * Latest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
" In Bertoldi v State of New York, 275 AD2d 227, the Appellate Division, First Department, stated that "[t]he principle of equal pay for equal work need not be applied in all cases under any and all circumstances. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:07 am
Among those, it was stated that the additional costs incurred directly by the provision of access to the satellite signal were zero in this case. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
Budvar opposed, citing the following alleged prior rights: (i) a figurative Bud mark effective for ‘all types of light and dark beer’, in Austria, Benelux and Italy; (ii) the appellation of origin ‘Bud’, registered under the Lisbon Agreement in respect of beer, and effective in France, Italy and Portugal; (iii) an Austrian appellation of origin ‘Bud’ protected in Austria under a bilateral convention with the former state of… [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:45 am by Venkat
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction -- State v. [read post]