Search for: "State v. Body"
Results 701 - 720
of 14,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2023, 10:30 am
Supreme Court last year in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 7:12 am
It is particularly pernicious when that legislative body has made it clear they have no interest in learning the truth about this medical care and young people like LW. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
The rapid speed at which AI capabilities are advancing compels the United States to lead in this moment for the sake of our security, economy, and society. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 4:10 am
In Hodes & Nauser MDs PA v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 7:59 am
Third Circuit Decision Provides Guidance In the case of Sapp v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 7:01 am
B.L., and People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In Oklahoma Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm
That right might therefore be overridden by a state body, provided there was a sufficiently pressing need to do so for one of the purposes in Article 9(2) and the means used were both lawful and proportionate, applying the four-stage proportionality test in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) (SC(E)) [2014] AC 700 [at 20] and allowing the state body an appropriate discretionary area of judgment. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:29 pm
To be sure, the purpose of the IFR is to seek to comply with a 2021 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:38 am
In Tapis International v INS , 94 F. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
V. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
Section 1 provides that:- “(1) A statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant. (2)For the purposes of this section, harm to the reputation of a body that trades for profit is not “serious harm” unless it has caused or is likely to cause the body serious financial loss. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 8:39 am
Any financial institution subject to Title V of the Gamm Leach Bliley Act. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:06 am
But the right to manifest one’s religious freedom is qualified because it may have an impact on others and may be overridden by a state body if there is sufficient need to do so. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
& Marper v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm
Section 5(1)(g) extends the ACL to the ‘engaging in conduct outside Australia’ by bodies corporate carrying on business in Australia. [read post]
