Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 701 - 720 of 1,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2012, 2:05 am by sally
High Court (Chancery Division) Pressdram Ltd v Whyte [2012] EWHC 1885 (Ch) (30 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) London Borough of Islington v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2012] EWHC 1716 (Admin) (27 June 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Tael One Partners Ltd v Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc [2012] EWHC 1858 (Comm) (09 July 2012) High Court (Patents Court) Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Hickin, heard 3 July 2012. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm by NL
May, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin)When can a Local Authority refuse to accept an application as homeless? [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 18 – 19 June 2012. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
The case of McLaughlin v London Borough of Lambeth was settled just before the commencement of a 20 day trial by Eady J. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:01 am by FT
So the LL has a discretion as to whether to proceed further.The other case the Court in Stafford considered was Forbes v Lambeth London Borough Council[2003] EWHC 222 (QB). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:24 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Page & Anor v Hewetts Solicitors & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 805 (15 June 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Mabanga v Ophir Energy Plc & Anor [2012] EWHC 1589 (QB) (15 June 2012) London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB) (15 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Dalriada Trustees Ltd v Woodward & Ors [2012] EWHC 21626 (Ch) (15 June 2012) High Court (Family Division) The… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:21 pm by Adam Wagner
She relied by analogy on the decision of the House in Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10, [2006] 2 AC 465, where the House considered the article 8 right to respect for the home. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:22 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Penfold v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1222 (01 June 2012) Gilbert v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1221 (01 June 2012) Saunders v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1185 (01 June 2012) Sandhu v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1187 (01 June 2012) Clark & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1220 (01 June 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) B (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 737 (31 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bento v The Chief Constable… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
However, in principle, the question of negligence is a matter for the Claimants to establish but the question of inevitability is, as stated in Manchester Corp v Farnworth for Thames Water to establish. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
However, in principle, the question of negligence is a matter for the Claimants to establish but the question of inevitability is, as stated in Manchester Corp v Farnworth for Thames Water to establish. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:11 am by tracey
& Ors v HX Investments Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 708 (31 May 2012) Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 729 (30 May 2012) De Brito & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 709 (30 May 2012) QEB Metallics Ltd v Peerzada & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 728 (30 May 2012) AL (Albania) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 710 (30 May 2012) HM Revenue and Customs… [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:22 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Greene King Plc v Quisine Restaurants Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 698 (24 May 2012) Hinchcliffe & Anor v Smith & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 696 (24 May 2012) Ingosstrakh -Investments v BNP Paribas SA [2012] EWCA Civ 644 (24 May 2012) Cavenagh v William Evans Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 697 (24 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council, R (on the application of) v Secretary of… [read post]