Search for: "State v. Cousins" Results 701 - 720 of 871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A.L. was dancing with her cousin and Father pulled her off the dance floor. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A.L. was dancing with her cousin and Father pulled her off the dance floor. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:41 am by Steve Hall
Lentini characterized as having “a wretched state of the art. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 1:07 pm by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
One of the most recent and well-known cases in the United States would be Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:14 am
  Keker, as you recall, is defending Scruggs against a charge of criminal contempt of court instigated by federal Judge William Acker relating to the Renfroe v. [read post]
IAC
26 May 2011, 4:17 am by Russ Bensing
Take State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm by Joseph Margulies
I might think the Constitution should reach more of national life than another person; I think the Court was wrong, for instance, to overrule Roe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A.L. was dancing with her cousin and Father pulled her off the dance floor. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Inventive Step) (Patent Docs)   US Patents Applying Supreme Court precedent: Carlsbad Technology v HIF Bio (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) USPTO not laying off employees (IP Watchdog) USPTO maintenance fees (Patently-O) Merchants warranty of non-infringement (Patently-O) PLI patent bar review tour (IP Watchdog) Provisional patent applications: waiting to file non-provisionals (Patently-O) 35 USC § 315(C) and its uncodified cousin – inter partes re-examination… [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:03 am by Veronika Gaertner
Burkhard Hess: “Staatenimmunität und ius cogens im geltenden Völkerrecht: Der Internationale Gerichtshof zeigt die Grenzen auf” – the English abstract reads as follows: This article deals with the decision of the International Court of Justice in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
That standard is said to have two goals, to ‘reduce, if not annul altogether, divergences between Member States’, and to ‘highlight the (mis-)perceived freedom of several Member States when transposing EU directives into law’.If one is an unabashed fan of both the CJEU and the idea that the Common Market necessitates that all copyright laws be the same in that market down to every jot and tittle, then one would agree. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
  This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 5:08 pm
 58 is very similar to Manitoba’s curative provision and thus the leading appellate authority on its meaning is George v. [read post]