Search for: "State v. Deal" Results 701 - 720 of 29,376
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm by MBettman
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Finally, the concurrence set out to figure the scope of the Texas Constitutional provision dealing with the separation-of powers. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm by Rosalind English
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44] per Lord Carswell,… [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm by Josh Blackman
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:17 pm by The Complex Litigator
 That finding by the trial court prompted the Court of Appeal to spend a good deal of time discussing the two different tests presented in the California Supreme Court cases of Discover Bank v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:16 pm by The Complex Litigator
This one entertains me becaues it faintly evokes the studio system of the 1930's and the decades of antitrust action by the FTC, with United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 3:38 am
Well, as the nation's only Arctic state and being the governor of that state, Alaska feels and sees impacts of climate change more so than any other state. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:16 am
The claims arose from the stock borrow program created by NSCC to deal electronically with temporary short term fails-to-deliver. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:07 am
Where injunctive relief was sought in the English court, the claimant should deal both with state immunity from the adjudicative jurisdiction of the court and with state immunity from enforcement. [read post]