Search for: "State v. F. T." Results 701 - 720 of 18,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In 1986, just four years after the passage of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Supreme Court held that while the Charter doesn’t apply directly to courts or the common law — at least in the context of purely private litigation — it has residual relevance when it comes to the common law’s application and development (RWDSU v Dolphin Delivery). [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 9:15 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he existence of a valid business relationship (not necessarily evidenced by an enforceable contract)” City of Rock Falls v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:35 am by John-Paul Boyd KC
I really couldn’t care less; it happens, and it happens a lot.) [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]