Search for: "State v. Francies"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,062
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
Delta and Virgin v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
Every student of national security law knows about Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 2:35 pm
From Myles v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
Levy v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
In 2015, IJOEH was acquired by the Taylor & Francis publishing group, which, in short order, declined to renew Egilman’s contract to serve as editor. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:27 pm
Francis church from the ages of 10 to 15. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:01 am
Courts and regulators provided some clarification (in Microsoft v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 5:41 am
In view of this purported lack of clarity, the EPI president (Francis Leyder) wrote a letter to the President of the EPO requesting the President to refer the issue to the EBA. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:00 pm
Francis G. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
(Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Breaking news: Lara Jade Coton awarded $130,000 in damages (Plagiarism Today) Ohio record pirating statute pre-empted by Copyright Act: State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
MacDonald, Aiden Francis. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
United States On 13 June 2023, the Texas Governor signed HB4 to make Texas the tenth state to have a comprehensive privacy law. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:09 am
K 5293 O27 2011 Obscenity and the limits of liberalism / edited by Loren Glass and Charles Francis Williams. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
In Whren v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd October 4, 2011 System of licences for broadcasting football matches which grants broadcasters territorial exclusivity on a Member State basis and prohibits television viewers from watching broadcasts with decoder card in other Member States is contrary to EU law. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Incorporated (IPKat) England’s new shirt sponsors? [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:39 am
The defendant in the case is Francis Janosko and here, according to the statement of facts in the brief he filed on appeal, is how it arose and what it involved: Janosko, a pretrial detainee being held on state charges at the Plymouth County Correctional facility (`PCCF’), had access to a computer at PCCF that carried a legal research program. [read post]
