Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 701 - 720 of 8,237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2019, 9:13 am
Also, see Appeal Court of Düsseldorf stating that the different treatment of SEP licensees is accepted if it can be justified as a result of normal market behaviour, and that licensing conditions can be abusive, only if they are significantly different between licensees; see Sisvel v Haier, Appeal Court of Düsseldorf, 30 March 2017 - Case No. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 10:37 pm by Florian Mueller
While only the actual pursuit of a foreign antisuit injunction against a SEP holder is--under the Munich appeals court's Nokia v. [read post]
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:27 pm by N. Peter Rasmussen
State Claims Against Hedge Funds Survive SLUSA ChallengeThe Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act did not preempt state claims against the directors and administrators of two defunct hedge funds (Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Herman & Jim Lennon
KSR the 5th Anniversary: One Supremely Obvious MessOn Monday, April 30, 2007, the United States Supreme Court issued its final decision in the matter of KSR v. [read post]