Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2012, 8:54 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am
Applying to federal enclaves only (of which the District of Columbia is one), it was affirmed in 2010 with respect to the states in McDonald-v-Chicago. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am
United States, the Court limited the availability of enhanced sentences for drug dealers whose customers die or suffer serious injuries. [read post]
6 May 2007, 2:03 pm
RAC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 4:32 pm
Southern Realty and Development, LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:49 am
This post was authored by Patrick Faivre, Jacob D. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:54 am
Micah’s Way v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:06 pm
V Nonimmigrant Visas for Family Reunification The new bill allows for special provisions to keep families together via the V nonimmigrant visa type. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 8:27 am
The Download of the Week is McDonald v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 5:28 pm
Simpson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:15 pm
For example, in McCauley v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:15 pm
For example, in McCauley v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
A year ago this Saturday, the Supreme Court's Dobbs abortion ruling overturned Roe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm
The South African High Court judgment in the case of amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services [2019] ZAGPPHC 384 is a victory for privacy rights. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
However, the Apple v Samsung cases pending before several national courts in Europe expose the inherent limitations of such provisions. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:08 am
Miller, 687 F.3d 199 (4th Cir. 2012) and United States v. [read post]
