Search for: "State v. KAVANAUGH"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2024, 5:11 am
SEC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:02 am
[in] a college sports system that generates huge sums for schools but provides little or no compensation to the players.In a concurring opinion to the Court's unanimous 9-0 decision, Justice Kavanaugh said it best (National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:00 pm
"] Today the Court heard oral argument in Torres v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Additionally, in Phillip v. [read post]
30 May 2020, 7:09 pm
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:59 am
Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
This argument is well-stated. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:08 am
In response to Stone’s arguments, Justice Kavanaugh stated that “a strong argument” from the other side was that individuals are allowed to file suit against the states on issues such as bankruptcy, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and Title VII. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
The oral argument on Tuesday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:24 pm
States may consent to suit, see Sossamon v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 11:25 am
The shortest first-day signed majority opinion over this period was the court’s 2005 decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm
See, e.g., McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 2:52 pm
On Monday, March 25, 2019, the United States Supreme Court held oral argument on Dutra Group v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 8:56 am
Ford v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The decision came in Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
states, “we may not engraft our own exceptions onto the statutory text. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 11:05 am
Sanchez v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Sackett v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, decided shortly before Bush v. [read post]
