Search for: "State v. KAVANAUGH" Results 701 - 720 of 2,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2022, 7:29 am by jonathanturley
Kavanaugh also stated the obvious in calling Roe “important precedent” and noting that the Court strives to preserve precedent. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:10 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit held, or whether the court must also find that the state court’s application of Chapman v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am by Robert Loeb, Cesar Lopez-Morales
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 3:37 pm by Samuel Bray
The first use of the phrase was Canal Auth. of State of Fla. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1614, 1618 (2022) (Barrett, J.); United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm by Deborah Heller
If Brett Kavanaugh is not confirmed by the Senate, the Court would have only 8 Justices and be at risk of having some split (4-4) decisions. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:28 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Friday morning read: Mississippi Asks Supreme Court to End Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:39 am by Florian Mueller
If Justice Kavanaugh hadn't joined the liberal minority, Judge YGR's dismissal of the case would probably have been affirmed.But (at least) the part of the Epic Games v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:00 am by Evan Lee
During Tuesday’s telephonic oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm by David Oscar Markus
Arizona, Justice Gorsuch dissents from the denial of certiorari (which was not joined by Justice Kavanaugh, though he did indicate he would grant the petition). [read post]
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) Tuesday filed a petition with the Supreme Court seeking a reversal of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
In his first Supreme Court opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for a unanimous court yesterday in Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]