Search for: "State v. Long." Results 701 - 720 of 51,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am by Jocelyn Hutton
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 am by Eric Goldman
” The court explains: “It is not misleading, for example, for Defendants to state on their website that they are about twenty miles away from Long Beach. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 12:06 pm
United States (06-7517); Bridge v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:36 am by Meyers Nave
The State Aeronautics Act is not commonly the subject of land use lawsuits, but it was for the Sixth District Court of Appeal in the case of Watsonville Pilots Association v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:08 pm
" (Article V, Section 8).I'm quite confident that others knew about this quirk in the California pardon scheme, but I didn't. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  I am pleased to observe that this rule has already long been settled law in the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am by Maureen Johnston
Therefore, we are posting our list of petitions to watch at the “Long Conference” in three separate installments. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 7:00 am by Evaleen Hellinga
If you have questions about managing employees on long-term leaves, please get in touch! [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:Alarmed by recent headlines regarding the demise of organized labor in the United States, I turn to the founding of the republic to show that hostility to labor unions has a long history. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
`[C]ontent-based restrictions on speech have been permitted, as a general matter, only when confined to the few “historic and traditional categories [of expression] long familiar to the bar”’ U.S. v. [read post]