Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 701 - 720
of 21,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm
The Hearing Officer also looked at the state of the Register and found that the Opponent’s family of marks at its highest consisted of three members, which was not enough to build an expectation in the minds of consumers that the Opponent is the source of all marks containing ‘BOMBAY’ for goods in classes 32 and 33. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 8:20 am
Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Breyer joined (Iancu v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
In Iancu v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 6:47 am
In Marks v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 1:44 pm
According to Han Beauty Inc v Alberto-Culver Co., 236 F.3d 1333, (Fed. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:53 am
Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH (Case C-523/10); [2012] WLR (D) 117 “Article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters meant that an action relating to infringement of a trade mark registered in a member state because of the use, by an advertiser, of a keyword identical to that trade mark on a search engine website… [read post]
21 May 2013, 3:33 am
Governor Mark Dayton signed the bill into law on the first business day following a 37-30 vote by the state senate in St. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
See, e.g., Signal Cos. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
The TMO’s Practice Notice on sound marks states that a Canadian sound mark application should: 1. state that the application is for the registration of a sound mark; 2. contain a drawing that graphically represents the sound; 3. contain a description of the sound; and 4. contain an electronic recording of the sound in MP3 or WAVE format recorded on a CD or DVD, with a maximum file size of 5MB. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 7:18 am
The ruling in Riggs v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:33 am
In, DC Comics v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:55 am
After all, we don't want to let the other side in on it… But here's what I can tell you: In what marked the first of several Supreme Court Moot Advocacy Courts of the year, Andy Rossman HLS '92, a partner at Akin Gump, stood in front of dozens of HLS students and rehearsed his defense of the constitutionality of the New York State convention system as questioned in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:30 am
A great source to find out about the type of marks that are registerable in each Member State is the Member Profile online tool. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 8:11 pm
In June, we will be marking the fifth anniversary of the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:00 pm
The trial of Mark Jensen in State of Wisconsin -v- Mark D. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:31 pm
The Georgia State University College of Law will hold a one-day symposium on Friday, October 23, 2009, to mark the tenth anniversary of the United States Supreme Court's integration mandate in Olmstead v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:55 am
Regardless, the quote suggests itself as the inspiration behind the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California‘s charging decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 4:11 pm
This word, mark or symbol is a trademark or service mark eligible for state or federal trademark registration. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:12 am
The Board of Appeal of the EUIPO confirmed the rejection of the sound and stated in its reasoning that the sign was not 'catchy' enough to stand out from the already existing jingles and did not fulfil the origin function of a trade mark. [read post]
