Search for: "State v. Money"
Results 701 - 720
of 20,447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2016, 4:07 am
The United States Supreme Court rendered a notable opinion in January 2016. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:34 am
It could either turn down the money or, if it’s not dignified enough to do that, it could take the money and establish a private organization to do this work instead of a State agency. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:13 pm
McNamara v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 4:05 pm
State of Indiana, WANE TV 15 out of Fort Wayne reports this evening:A recent decision by the Indiana Supreme Court could save Hoosier taxpayers money they didn't know they were paying. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
Hiestand lost money or property "as a result of" the defendants' alleged violation of that law. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:38 pm
Given the recent ruling United States Supreme Court decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 8:32 am
In case of State v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:30 am
Kitazato v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 6:01 am
In many Orlando car accidents, the amount of insurance money available is contingent upon the language of the policy. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:35 pm
Sand & Gravel Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:31 am
However, there is a lingering concern that State legislators, having already raided the tobacco trust fund to meet State budget shortfalls, would be tempted to do the same with Court trust funds. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm
Money Mart Express, Inc. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
Carothers replied "Because we don't have the money. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
In Williamson City Planning v Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 6:55 am
The statute in that case was a funding condition on federal money given to universities -- but the Court's decision held that the government could impose the same rule categorically, whether or not the universities got funds.As the Rumsfeld v. [read post]
