Search for: "State v. Monroe"
Results 701 - 720
of 898
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2010, 10:28 am
In Monroe v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 10:55 am
v=PlpBB4o8xq8 [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:45 am
On Wednesday, December 16, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Foster v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
Monroe County Children and Youth Services, 577 F.3d 186, 191-92 (3d Cir.2009) (quoting Pearson, 129 S.Ct. at 818). [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:01 am
Monroe County, 2d Cir., No. 08-0947, 11/13/09). [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
Monroe Co. 1997]; People v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:46 am
Godfrey v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 4:48 am
Matter of PERB v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use: Spanos v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:25 am
Megan Herrington won in Kargus v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:18 am
Monroe County Board of Education, 526 U.S. 629 (1999). [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:48 pm
The case cite is CMG Brands, LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:33 am
Moreover, since the issue of MEI's capacity to commence an action was not determined on appeal, collateral estoppel does not bar relitigation of that issue (see Tydings v Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP, 11 NY3d 195, 200; Sabbatini v Galati, 43 AD3d 1136; Bergstol v Town of Monroe, 305 AD2d 348). [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
His scholarly writings on the subject have been cited in numerous cases including, in New York, Horning v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:21 pm
Harrison v United States, 392 US 219, 224-225 (1968). [read post]
