Search for: "State v. Murphy"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
These three paragraphs state cumulative conditions. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 11:30 am
Plaintiff WinWare is represented by Thomas, Kayden, Horstemeyer & Risley, LLP of Atlanta.Peach State Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:05 am
View the original article here.Recently, in a 6-to-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Murphy v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 3:03 pm
As previously stated, the Act will go into effect on October 29, 2018. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:46 pm
The dissent (Murphy, J.) objected to the court’s encroachment on state policymaking prerogative. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:24 am
Bucklew v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
” The concurrence took aim at the Sixth Circuit precedent of United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 1:53 pm
CO. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 2:47 am
The Court’s Analysis A few years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Miller v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
The right to a disciplinary hearing may survive the individual’s resignation or retirement from the position Hughes v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 7:46 am
Murphy Oil USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 10:12 am
State v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 6:00 am
Whether you agree with those views or not, they spark discussion and offer an idiosyncratic viewpoint that often makes a great deal of sense.He expressed another one of these views again last week in Murphy v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 6:00 am
(b), (c); Murphy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 7:53 pm
As but one example of the concerns to which I refer, Ceci and Bruck, presenting the Amicus Brief for the case of State of New Jersey v. [read post]
