Search for: "State v. Outing" Results 701 - 720 of 90,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 12:24 pm
The Fifth Circuit, in an opinion released today in the appeal of Tuepker v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 2:49 pm by Zachary Spilman
Last week’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:01 pm
James Otero of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an opinion granting summary judgment for the defendant in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 9:32 pm by Denese Dominguez
As opposed to the State, a criminal defendant has no right to immediately appeal a circuit court's decision not to suppress evidence and has no right to pursue a cross-appeal in a State's appeal under CJ section 12-302(c)(3). [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:10 pm by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
Recently, a Massachusetts appellate court examined the factors necessary to establish jurisdiction over an out of state defendant, in Roch v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:37 am by sally
Vicoplus SC PUH v v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid; BAM Vermeer Contracting sp. zoo v Same; Olbek Industrial Services sp. zoo v Same (Case C-307/09 to C-309/09); [2011] WLR (D) 46 “Articles 56FEU and 57FEU of the FEU Treaty did not preclude a member state from making the hiring out on its territory of workers who were Polish nationals subject to the obtaining of a work permit during the transitional period provided for in… [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:56 am
” Curtiss had cited Rausch v Pellegrini, 237 AD2d 771, in support of his “out of title” work argument. [read post]