Search for: "State v. P. S."
Results 701 - 720
of 20,973
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2023, 4:30 pm
People v Wheeler, 2023 WL 5622596 (CA App. 8/4/2023) [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm
In State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:15 pm
The decision in Matter of Hoffmann v New York State Independent Redistricting Commission is here. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:42 am
See Craig v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
” (Id. at p. 395, italics omitted.) [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:55 am
Those who coined the term “backdoor search” point to a 2019 decision (pp. 68-79), United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:30 am
For example, in Gill v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 3:13 am
McKnight v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
United States Reuters reports the US District Court for the District of Montana blocked a ban on TikTok that was set to take effect in Montana 1 Jan. 2024. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 1:54 pm
In Tereshchenko v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am
Precise use of these concepts is therefore essential to properly assess a computer program’s technical contribution. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:48 am
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v Town of Mount Pleasant, 2023 WL 4491197 (D. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:30 am
In Wilkow v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
The Court has developed a rich case law allowing for a narrow interpretation of its competence’s exclusion concerning restrictive measures (Rosneft; Bank Refah), public procurement and staff management (Elitaliana; H v Council), and international agreements concluded under Article 37 TEU (Mauritius). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
On January 1, 2024, Peter Pan will finally enter the public domain in the United States—but not in Barrie’s native United Kingdom. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Robert P. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
However, the assessment of the inherent distinctive character of a sign must be made only by reference to the goods and services and the perception of the sign in question (Henkel v OHIM, C-456/01 P at para. 35). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
