Search for: "State v. Public Service Commission" Results 701 - 720 of 5,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
   First, he argues that his service as President from 2017 to 2021 did not bring him within the operation of Section 3 in the first instance because Section 3 does not expressly refer to the President and because the presidency is not an office “of the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 5:39 am by Michael DeRose
The board’s decision was upheld on summary judgment by the state Public Employment Relations Commission, which handles disputes between public agencies and public employees, and by the Appellate Division. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:43 am
The Directive provides that if a Member State introduces stricter requirements, the bill must be notified to the EU Commission and a committee which will control that the provisions fulfill requirements set forth in Article 24, paragraph 2, before the bill is introduced: * justified on grounds of public health * such measures shall be proportionate* and may not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member… [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
Winston Gibson v Public Service Commission; Ranjan Rampersad v Commissioner of Police and Police Service Commission; Robert Ramsahai v Teaching Service Commission; Ashford Sankar & Others v Public Service Commission; Gopichand Ganga and Others v Commissioner of Police and Others; and Hermia Tyson-Cuffie v Public Service… [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Sargent, All Rights Reserved, Thursday, May 21, 2009 - EEO/iNews is a free publication of EEO Services by John D. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
Winston Gibson v Public Service Commission; Ranjan Rampersad v Commissioner of Police and Police Service Commission; Robert Ramsahai v Teaching Service Commission; Ashford Sankar & Others v Public Service Commission; Gopichand Ganga and Others v Commissioner of Police and Others; and Hermia Tyson-Cuffie v Public Service… [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am by Cyberleagle
First, the Law Commission did not discuss how the offence might apply to public online communications. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:39 am
Minnesota’s Department of Public Safety has instructed the state’s ISPs to block access by state residents to a list of gambling sites, claiming authority under the Wire Act (18 U.S.C. 1084). [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:35 am
Order the department to promote each petitioner to the position of Social Welfare Examiner II from the eligible list number 71-299 and pay them retroactive to the date on which they each first became eligible for promotion to date, with interest.Paolini contended that a November 17, 1992 decision by State Supreme Court Justice Lockman -- Livingston v Nassau County Civil Service Commission, [Index 14457-92, not selected for publication in the Official… [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
Winston Gibson v Public Service Commission; Ranjan Rampersad v Commissioner of Police and Police Service Commission; Robert Ramsahai v Teaching Service Commission; Ashford Sankar & Others v Public Service Commission; Gopichand Ganga and Others v Commissioner of Police and Others; and Hermia Tyson-Cuffie v Public Service… [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am by INFORRM
Public order cases involving protests have always sparked controversy, with the collision between the state’s responsibility to ensure the smooth running of civil society and the individual citizen’s right to draw attention to what they regard as a pressing moral concern. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  Other cases dealt with public employee unionism, states’ immunity from lawsuits in other states’ courts, federal courts’ authority to hear securities cases based on state law, and Indian tribes’ rights in contracting with the federal government over public services for tribal members. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
However, the Court takes pains to note that it is not, as argued by petitioner, only or primarily the functional relationship between respondents and the State actors, including the Legislature, the State-created Commission on hospital closings, and the State Department of Health, that is dispositive here. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
For publication opinions today (3): In James Keeney v. [read post]