Search for: "State v. Quinn" Results 701 - 720 of 888
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by John Elwood
Certiorari stage documents: §  Opinion below (9th Circuit) §  Petition for certiorari §  Brief in opposition §  Petitioner’s reply Title: Quinn v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: Quinn v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am by John Elwood
United States (10-5296) and Vazquez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:27 pm by cdw
Illinois Governor Pat Quinn remains on the fence on SB 3539, the bill to repeal the death penalty in that state, you can call him at his Springfield office at 217-782-6830 and also at his Chicago office at 312-814-2121, to express your thoughts. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:17 pm by Katie Smith, ACLU
Pat Quinn signed a bill into law that brought civil unions to Illinois. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:28 pm by Stefanie Levine
Gene Quinn, of IPWatchdog and Practice Center Contributor, passed along this article on the recent Federal Circuit decision Centillion Data Systems, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:28 pm by Stefanie Levine
Gene Quinn, of IPWatchdog and Practice Center Contributor, passed along this article on the recent Federal Circuit decision Centillion Data Systems, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 10:11 pm by Paul Caron
Following up on my recent posts (links below) on the gigantic individual (67%) and business (45%) income tax hikes recently approved in Illinois: New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is running this ad soliciting Illinois businesses to move to his state: Illinois Governor Pat Quinn is not pleased: Indiana and Wisconsin... [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:41 am
USPTO Director Kappos has stated that by including the PCT "more work can be shared between our two offices. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:47 am by Michael Carrier
” The second reason the Court should hear the case is to ensure the viability of the important antitrust case of Verizon v. [read post]