Search for: "State v. Sherman" Results 701 - 720 of 1,947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 8:17 pm
See 316 U.S. at 252 ("[t]he price fixing features of appellees' licensing system, which are not within the protection of the patent law, violate the Sherman Act").United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Lee v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:54 am by FDABlog HPM
Supreme Court asking the Court to grant the Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed last month by a group of drug purchasers in Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc., et al., v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 9:50 am by Florian Mueller
I'm much less interested in what California will say, as the anti-anti-steering injunction was merely Epic's consolation prize while the strategically important battle here is over Epic's claims under federal antitrust law (Sherman Act).DOJ officials attended every single day of the spring 2021 trial, and the DOJ is rumored to be preparing its own United States v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:08 am
HIIT Peloton classes and our fav teachers Hanna Frankson and Jen Sherman on the bike and Daniel McKenna for strength. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 4:58 am by Amy Howe
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Paul Sherman urges the Court to grant cert. in Worley v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:54 pm by David Zaring
  In terms of the legality of salary caps, while we don't have a clear-cut holding stating that pro sports league salary caps violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act, the behavior of those leagues suggests that they believe that salary caps are vulnerable to antitrust rebuke. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
“All of us understanding the meaning of the third section,” Senator John Sherman of Ohio stated, “those men who have once taken an oath of office to support the Constitution of the United States and have violated that oath in spirit by taking up arms against the Government of the United States are to be deprived for a time at least of holding office. [read post]