Search for: "State v. Six"
Results 701 - 720
of 19,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 5:12 am
Louisiana that the Sixth Amendment (as incorporated against the states by the 14th Amendment) guarantees criminal defendants the right to a unanimous jury, it meant a 12-person jury — not a six-person jury, which is all that Florida affords some felony defendants. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
Campfield v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm
Near the end of 2023, the United States Supreme Court declined to consider the City of Costa Mesa’s appeal of a January Ninth Circuit ruling in SoCal Recovery, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
It is named after the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am
Their only power -- to seek state punishment for rule violators -- is a regressive function. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
In Kellner v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
The Supreme Court in 2011 in Pepper v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Newsom, concurring: The policy is unconstitutional six ways from Saturday (get it?). [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 11:12 am
In October, the Georgia Supreme Court upheld the state’s six-week abortion ban. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:03 am
In August 2023, the EPA announced its six NECIs[1] for the fiscal year 2024-2027 cycle. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 1:24 pm
In November 2020, the agency filed a complaint against big cat exhibitors Jeffrey and Lauren Lowe (of “Tiger King” notoriety) for Animal Welfare Act and Endangered Species Act violations (United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
See State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:02 pm
See Piontek v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:46 am
Selembo v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
United States Trustee v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
Planning and Conservation League, et al v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 10:10 am
FBI v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 9:42 am
It duly held by six votes to one that there had been a violation of Article 8 (private and family life): “the Court considers that the respondent State has overstepped its margin of appreciation and has failed to comply with its positive obligation to ensure that the applicants had a specific legal framework providing for the recognition and protection of their same-sex unions” [123]. [read post]