Search for: "State v. Smart" Results 701 - 720 of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2016, 12:35 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
”  Plaintiff further contends that Dunkin’ Defendants are misappropriating Plaintiff’s trademarked “Sweet Swaps®” by the use of a similar term “Smart Swaps. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As John Vile argues in his insightful 2016 book, Convention Wisdom, if state legislators control the convention calls and later ratification of the convention’s proposals, they should definitely not also fill the convention itself: checks and balances are essential within the Article V convention process (p.146). [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:47 am by Rick Hasen
” While the move to increase participation among the Democratic base may be a smart one, I cannot think of a more stupid name for the initiative—it is going to feed into the right-wing Democratic voter fraud meme. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
They argue that, because the Supreme Court stated that Civil Code section 1717 bars contractual attorneys' fees in voluntarily dismissed cases only with respect to "causes of action sounding in contract" (Santisas v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:17 am by Florian Mueller
In the near term, there is nothing that Apple has to fear from the enforcement of SEPs in EU Member States. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Frank A Smart & Sons Ltd (Scotland), heard 6 Mar 2019. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:18 am
  These cases, include BIC Leisure v Windsurfing International (1988), Amsted Industry v National Castings (1990), TP Orthodontics v Professional Positioners (1990) and Magna Electronic v TRW Auto Holdings (2015). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Frank A Smart & Sons Ltd (Scotland), heard 6 Mar 2019. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am by Dave
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am by Dave
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be… [read post]