Search for: "State v. Snow" Results 701 - 720 of 913
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2010, 4:14 pm by Eric Talley
It is unlikely that such loyalists will become snowed or confused simply by having additional (but unproven) choices. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:55 am by Amanda Rice
An opinion piece for the New York Times defends the Court’s decision in the animal cruelty case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:08 am by ChristopherFEarley
The highest state court in Massachusetts  - the Supreme Judicial Court - in the case of  Papadopoulos v Target,  abolished the distinction of natural vs. unnatural accumulations of snow and ice this week. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:53 am by Erin Miller
        At a speech at Montana State University yesterday, Justice Scalia said that judges are not qualified to decide “the leading moral questions of the day” and that the big dividing line in the United States is between “those who believe [the Constitution] does not change and those who think it evolves. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:47 pm
Calling the distinction between natural and unnatural accumulations of ice and snow a "relic" derived from old cases, which "has sown confusion and conflict in our case law," the Court in Papadopoulos v. [read post]